Nullpunkts

ANNOTATIONS
UPON
TOPOLOGICAL PUNCTUATION :
MASTERING
MY PUNCTUATION HIERARCHY
IN
PROSE COMPOSITION.

LEAF № I
OF THE
CLꜶSE-CRAFT.
Written ﬆarting from the month of mꜽ , which is recognized as the 5ᵗʰ month , of the year Two thousand & Twenty-ﬁve in accordance with the Gregorian-calendar syﬆem adopted by the majority of nations World-wide.

CONSUETUDO

Font Dependency notice

To — correctly — use this Typing syﬆem It’s hereby suggeﬆed to use : junicode , nullpunktsenergiefont , whichof ; downloads are ꜹailable in : psb1558/Junicode-font & css/fonts/nullpunktsenergiefont-Regular.ttf , How-ever  usage of junicode is not a muﬆ and is at the discretion of the writer , alas ; downloading the « nullpunktsenergiefont-Regular.ttf » is a muﬆ & shall be obeyed.

To view these New Punctuation-marks in writing one ought for to download Scripty - Javascript Injector & activate This code , written hereinunder :

                        document.querySelectorAll('*').forEach(el => {
const style = getComputedStyle(el);
el.style.fontFamily = `${style.fontFamily}, 'nullpunktsenergiefont'`;
                        
                        });

and then ; set the « Run script if » as « http://*/*,https://*/* » and « Trigger » as « Automatically : On Page Load » , moreover ; should one wish to use Only junicode : They can also Use this Stylus code — which I am , currently , using :

                        *:not(.katex):not(.katex *){

                        font-family: 'Junicode', 'nullpunktsenergiefont', 'Times New Roman', Times, serif !important;

                        font-variant-ligatures:discretionary-ligatures contextual common-ligatures;

                        font-feature-settings: "ss17", "cv01","cv02";

                        font-variant-numeric:lining-nums;

                        }

PART A ⸺ FUNDAMENTALS

1. BꝎK 1

One mꜽ notice that I’ve given not Any examples , alas ; frꜽ not , for We will delve deep into Them when the Right time comes Further down , moreover  while practicing This discipline one ought for to Under-ﬆand that this Only applies to Written-regiﬆer , becꜷse ; Spoken-regiﬆer & Written-regiﬆers are of use to Diﬀerent needs , to clarify : Written-regiﬆer is used for to create texts that shall live longer than the ꜷthor of said text & Spoken-regiﬆer muﬆn’t not be Under-ﬆꝏd as the Ephemeral Information-sharing , used to give Quick information , regiﬆer betwixt interlocutors , thenceforth  We muﬆ regard Our sentences ⸻ if They’re not spend in — obviously , as one mꜽ know — Faﬆ-communication tꝏls ⸻ as Timeless beings that are created to Out-live the Very creators of Them , whencefore ; Punctuation marks are not used to indicate the Breathing-pꜷse places for the speaker but Logical & Meaning seperators working on the logic of sentence , and — by extension — not of grammar , to show the reader a sentence : came whence , goes whither , what is shown there , what is herein shown , & is — currently — where and help the person who’s interacting with the sentence how to parse the meaning of It , ergo  while reading a sentence We muﬆ not think of Punctuation marks as breaths but Land-marks to show Us the place , Eﬀectively meaning ; one ought to use Them currently , leﬆ We — miﬆakenly — use a : Quarti-colon , Terti-colon , Semi-colon , colon , & alii to not indicate what’s the logic where We are but to show an Imaginary speaker Their line , and — in the end ; cꜷse the Real reader to lꝏse Them-selves becꜷse of Such sin to use Written-regiﬆer for the purposes of Spoken-regiﬆer , verily ; for no Such thing exiﬆs as Pꜷse-&-breate time for Punctuation marks since — indubitabilis : a Quarti-colon possess nꜷght alike that , nor a colon , nor a comma , & nor others We mꜽ use , ergo ; We mꜽn’t speak of « pꜷsing to breathe » while writing Our sentences , Quite miﬆakenly  the privilige of This youth — those who are born after the 18cc — is that They hꜹe tꝏls of Inﬆant communication : telegrams , Phone-lines , Poﬆal services , Inter-connected networks & technology to use that , alas ; those Very technologies are the culprits who hꜹe eroded the meaning of writing until It has become to mean : Smaller & Basic communications , How-ever  a problem exiﬆs with that explanation , for ‘tis of chalant World-view againﬆ what has humanity has created : Time-independent communication — i.e./ to encode thoughts in a way that let’s the ideas Them-selves Out-laﬆ the Very hands who wrote Them at the moment at the coﬆ of being Under-ﬆꝏd by others later — which is one of the Moﬆ-profound achievements in all of Human history , surely ; One — as Me — muﬆ be tired of people taking this Mind-exhilarating & Revelatory skill humans hꜹe for granted inﬆead of seeing the truth , that We are the Only species capable of performing Said activity.

1.1. The set.

Set is a collection of marks that is used in writing to mark Logic & Meaning points in a sentence — the Primary sets We hꜹe are 3 in № , They’re the : Main set , 2ⁿᵈ set , & set Niche.

1.1.1. The Main set.

Our Main set of Punctuation marks , which will be used by Us , consiﬆ out of a : colon , Semi-colon , comma , Terti-colon , Quarti-colon , period , dash , hyphen , quͤﬆion mark , & Exclamation mark.

1.1.1.1. Colon.

A colon is used to : introduce a liﬆ seperated by commas , write a datum after It , introduce examples or clariﬁcations , mark Direct speech or quotations , signal deﬁnitions or explanations , or mark Dramatic or Rythmic pꜷse. When creating a liﬆ with This mark , We don’t go a Level deeper.

Setting It ; the period’s Unicode code is « U+003A » & character It-self is « : ».

1.1.1.2. Semi-colon.

It gathers all commas , if They exiﬆ , to form a liﬆ , if not ; It’s used chain Closely Related clꜷses — maybe even parallel — inside a sentence , How-ever ; when used with an adverb , It frees the sentence from the depth , How-ever ; when creating a liﬆ with This mark , We Naturally go a Level deeper , and don’t need a comma to accompany It.

Setting It ; the period’s Unicode code is « U+003B » & character It-self is « ; ».

1.1.1.3. Terti-colon

This is the Third-tier colon , with the naming coming from the word « Tertiary » — eﬀectively meaning « of the 3ʳᵈ order » , from the Latin-language word « tertiarius » — and They are , colloquially , the father of all Semi-colons , neﬆing Semi-colons together — mark the Logical block of the clꜷse at That point , in other words ; It’s used to wrap Multiple Semi-colon-chained clauses into a Single Higher-order Logical-block.

Setting the Terti-colon ; graphical description , since ‘tis a New glyph : « a pellet betwixt 3 Comma‐shaped charges sable , Their ﬆyle for positioning is  one in chief , one in Dexter base , & one in Sinister base , for each ; reversed so that It’s bulb is toward the pellet and It’s tail points Out-wards. » & It’s ﬆyles are : Unicode code « U+F56C » & character It-self «  ».

1.1.1.4. Quarti-colon

The 4ᵗʰ-tier colon — again from the word « quartus » , the Latin-language term for « of the 4ᵗʰ order » — represents the Higheﬆ order of Syntatic segmentation , to put It bluntly ; these can be , colloquially , called the mother the Major-logic blocks of the sentence , moreover  even at the sentences that mꜽ run for 1 000 words They are scarce , totalling at mꜽbe 2 or 3 , and ; They’re used to separate Entire Ideational geographies within a sentence.

Setting the Quarti-colon ; graphical description , since ‘tis a New glyph : « a pellet betwixt 4 Comma-shaped charges sable , Their ﬆyle is  one in chief , one in base , one in dexter , & one in sinister , and ; each reversed so that It’s bulb is toward the pellet and It’s tail points Out-wards. » & It’s ﬆyles are : Unicode code is « U+F56B » & character It-self «  ».

1.1.1.5. Comma.

A comma is used to : seperate items in a liﬆ , indicate a Brief pꜷse within a clꜷse , signal the incoming connector to join 2 Independent-clꜷses , seperate Quotation mark from the reﬆ of the sentence , be seperators in a title , clarify Syntactic boundries when needed , & write Non-continuous liﬆs , moreover ; in the job of creating an In-clꜷse Re-mark in a sentence They are weaker than dashes , but ﬆill go a Level deeper and can carry only 1 dash and can’t open a New realm In-side — meaning : a comma can’t bear the load of a whole New In-line sentence like a dash can , in addition  We won’t open a Seperate comma problems for dashes & commas mix , therefore ; We ought for to lꝏk at the problem that mꜽ arise during usage of commas to set oﬀ In-clꜷse Re-marks , as can be seen in the example markes as № 1 hereinunder.

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 1.1}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 1.1} \quad \text{,} \quad\text{Sub-text 1.2} }^{\textstyle\text{L⁰ Text 1}} \quad \text{—} \quad \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 2.1}\quad \text{,} \quad\text{Sub-text 2.2} }^{\textstyle\text{L⁰ Text 2}} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

As You can see a reader mꜽ Under-ﬆand this Correct neﬆing in the wꜽ provided below.

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{Ex./ 1.2}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \text{L⁰ Text 1} \quad \text{,} \quad \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 1.1} \quad \text{—} \quad \text{Sub-text 1.2} }^{\textstyle\text{L⁻¹ Text}} \quad \text{,} \quad \text{L⁰ Text 2} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

Problem with the Ex./ 1.2 is , that ; We are supposed to read It the wꜽ Ex./ 1.1 shows Us : both parts are L⁰ text that are seperated by an E.-d.d.E.o. and not the wꜽ Ex./ 1.2 shows Us : L⁰-level text followed by a L⁻¹-level section that rises back to L⁰ level , therefore  to ﬁx This issue We muﬆ use E.-d.d.A.o. and write Our sentence as ﬆated henceforth.

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 2}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 1.1} \quad \text{,} \quad\text{Sub-text 1.2} }^{\textstyle\text{L⁰ Text 1}} \quad \text{⸺} \quad \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 2.1}\quad \text{,} \quad\text{Sub-text 2.2} }^{\textstyle\text{L⁰ Text 2}} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

As one can see : since a comma can’t bear the weight of E.-d.d.A.o. In-side Them so We can Easily bypass the problem that arises by interpretation of the text in the wꜽ showed in Ex./ 1.2 by Simply using Em-dash der Anderiu ordunge to indicate that the comma pair is not an In-clꜷse Re-mark nor an In-clꜷse sentence.

1.1.1.6. Dash.

There exiﬆs 3 kinds of dash , each used for Diﬀerent purposes , How-ever  to Brieﬂy explain : E.-d.d.A.o.s & E.-d.d.E.o.s are on the Same level while the E.-d.d.D.o.s are a Level higher in the hierarcy , therefore ; We use E.-d.d.A.o.s to seperate from E.-d.d.E.o.s and use E.-d.d.D.o.s Retro-actively to mark the depth if We hꜹe to use dashes inside dashes , to explain further ; let Us see an example.

\[ \text{Sentence part} \left\{ \begin{array}{c} \text{L⁰ Text} \\ \text{⸻} \\ \text{L⁻¹ Text} \left\{ \begin{array}{c} \text{L⁻¹ Text 1} \left\{ \begin{array}{c} \text{Sub-text 1}~, \\ \text{Sub-text 2}~~ \end{array} \right. \\ \text{—} \\ \text{L⁻² Text 1} \left\{ \begin{array}{c} \text{Sub-text 1}~, \\ \text{Sub-text 2}~~ \end{array} \right. \\ \text{—} \\ \text{L⁻¹ Text 2} \left\{ \begin{array}{c} \text{Sub-text 1}~, \\ \text{Sub-text 2}~~ \end{array} \right. \end{array} \right. \\ \text{⸻} \\ \text{L⁰ Text} \end{array} \right. \]

As It can be seen here — in this Simple example , E.-d.d.D.o.s in this Sentence part is not a Level changer but Natural extension of E.-d.d.E.o. becoming longer to accomodate another E.-d.d.E.o..

1.1.1.6.1. Em-dash der Erﬆiu ordunge.

Em-dash of 1ˢᵗ order , also known as : Em-dash der Erﬆiu ordunge , is used to : signal a Stronger interruption than a comma would provide when use to create a Lower level in a sentence , mark the Same thought’s Side clꜷse , & carry Entire New clꜷses in It , should one need , unlike commas ; They are able to carry New clꜷses & Many more in Them and even hoﬆ connectors , for They’re not bound by commas.

Setting the dash ; E.-d.d.E.o.’s Unicode code is « U+2014 » & character It-self is « — ».

1.1.1.6.2. Em-dash der Anderiu ordunge.

Em-dash of 2ⁿᵈ order , or Em-dash der Anderiu ordunge , is a mark carries the task of setting indent for Type-setter , How-ever  for Us : It carries the task of seperation In-clꜷse Re-marks from Connected clꜷses when a situation of ambiguity is evident , e.g./ when using « text , text — text , text — text » combination We ought for to use the Em-dash der Anderiu ordunge and inﬆead write « text , text ⸺ text , text — text » — as explained in the 1.1.1.5. / Ex./ 2 , alas ; one mꜽ ask : « In 1.2.5.1. / Ex./ 2.3.1 & Ex./ 2.3.2 You allowed using « text — text , text ⸺ text » or « text ⸺ text , text — text » , then ; why can’t We do « text , text — text , text ⸺ text » ? » , and I will answer to Them as thus : « As We’ve ﬆated in the 1.1.1.5. the comma can only bear Em-dash der Ernﬆiu ordunge & never Em-dash der Anderiu ordunge , therefore ; although We mꜽ hꜹe the place to do « text — text , text ⸺ text » or « text ⸺ text , text — text » We hꜹe no place to do « text , text — text , text ⸺ text » becꜷse the Em-dash of the 1ˢᵗ order is betwixt 2 commas and can be interpretated as a text of L⁻¹ while in reality ‘twas a partitioner betwixt 2 L⁰ clꜷses. ».

Setting the dash ; E.-d.d.A.o.’s Unicode code is « U+2E3A » & character It-self is « ⸺ ».

1.1.1.6.3. Em-dash der Drittiu ordunge.

Em-dash of 3ʳᵈ order , or Em-dash der Drittiu ordunge , is a Rare mark used when an Em-dash of nᵗʰ order uses Another dash , marking the boundries of the In-clꜷse Re-mark , How-ever ; It can also be used to censor parts of text & introduce Massive breaks of though in stream-of-consciousness ﬆyle writing.

Setting the dash ; E.-d.d.D.o.’s Unicode code is « U+2E3B » & character It-self is « ⸻ ».

1.1.1.7. Period.

A period is used to kill sentences , mark the end of the abbreviations , & indicate the truncation of letters.

Setting It ; the period’s Unicode code is « U+002E » & character It-self is « . ».

1.1.1.8. Hyphen.

A hyphen is used : create Compound words , join preﬁxes , signal Certain №s in Adjectival form , & write Continuous liﬆs , on the topic of Continuous liﬆs : a Continous liﬆ is a liﬆ that includes All elements It has betwixt a to b , while a Non-continous liﬆ takes only the elements liﬆed.

Setting It ; the period’s Unicode code is « U+002D » & character It-self is « - ».

1.1.1.9. Quͤﬆion mark.

A quͤﬆion mark’s job is to : denote Direct quͤries & show the uncertainty as a note when used within brackets.

Setting It ; the period’s Unicode code is « U+003F » & character It-self is « ? ».

1.1.1.10. Exclamation mark.

An Axclamation mark is ; used to : convey Strong emotion , emphasis , or surprise , and : signal commands or show Exclamatory sentences.

Setting It ; the period’s Unicode code is « U+0021 » & character It-self is « ! ».

1.1.2. The 2ⁿᵈ set.

The 2ⁿᵈ set consiﬆs of a( n ) : apostrophe , Quotation marks , brackets , ellipsis , slash , ampersand.

1.1.2.1. Ampersands.

Ampersands are used to denote that 2 objects are not seperate , and that They ought to be taken together.

1.1.3. The set Niche.

The Niche set is made out of marks that are not used often , ergo ; the set includes , but is not limited to : Dash variants , Paragraph mark , Numero sign , Fractions marks , Up-scripts & Sub-scripts , daggers , caret , & der tildes.

1.1.4. Ligatures.

1.1.4.1. Ligatures , proper.

1.1.4.1.1. Ligatures , proper — unicode.

Ligatures , proper — unicode are Single length Glyph groups , and those who are currently in use are : ﬀ , ﬁ , ﬂ , ﬄ , ﬃ , ꝏ — & variants , ꜷ — & variants , ꜹ — & variants , ꜽ — & variants , ꝡ — & variants , ℥ , ﬆ , ꜩ — & variants , ĳ — & variants , ǌ — & variants , ꜵ — & variants , ƕ — & variants , ǉ — & variants , ɮ.

1.1.4.1.2. Ligatures , proper — 2ⁿᵈ set.

« Ligatures , proper — 2ⁿᵈ set » is a set that contains ligatures that are not created by a Single Unicode character but rather created by using Secondary glyphs. They are : aͤ , oͤ , uͤ , & yͤ.

1.1.4.1.3. Ligatures , proper mapping.

1.1.4.1.3.1. Ligatures , proper — unicode mapping.

This section includes mappings where each ligature is encoded as a Single Unicode character :

\[ \begin{array}{l c l} \text{Ligature} &\to& \text{De-composition} &,\ &\text{Unicode}\\ \end{array} \] \[ \begin{array}{l c l c l|l c l c l} \text{ﬀ} &\to& f + f &,& \text{U+FB00} & \text{Ꜷ} &\to& A + U &,& \text{U+A736}\\ \text{ﬁ} &\to& f + i &,& \text{U+FB01} & \text{Ꜹ} &\to& A + V &,& \text{U+A738}\\ \text{ﬂ} &\to& f + l &,& \text{U+FB02} & \text{Ꜽ} &\to& A + Y &,& \text{U+A73C}\\ \text{ﬃ}&\to& f + f + i &,& \text{U+FB03} & \text{Ꝏ} &\to& O + o &,& \text{U+A74E}\\ \text{ﬄ}&\to& f + f + l &,& \text{U+FB04} & \text{Ꜵ} &\to& A + o &,& \text{U+A734}\\ \text{ﬆ} &\to& s + t &,& \text{U+FB06} & \text{Ꝡ} &\to& V + y &,& \text{U+A760}\\ \text{ĳ} &\to& i + j &,& \text{U+0132} & \text{Ƕ} &\to& H + v &,& \text{U+01F6}\\ \text{Ĳ} &\to& I + J &,& \text{U+0133} & \text{Ꜩ} &\to& T + z &,& \text{U+A728}\\ \text{Ǌ} &\to& N + J &,& \text{U+01CA} & \text{ꝏ} &\to& o + o &,& \text{U+A74F}\\ \text{ǋ} &\to& N + j &,& \text{U+01CB} & \text{ꜷ} &\to& a + u &,& \text{U+A737}\\ \text{ǌ} &\to& n + j &,& \text{U+01CC} & \text{ꜹ} &\to& a + v &,& \text{U+A739}\\ \text{Ǉ} &\to& L + J &,& \text{U+01C7} & \text{ꜽ} &\to& a + y &,& \text{U+A73D}\\ \text{ǈ} &\to& L + j &,& \text{U+01C8} & \text{ꝡ} &\to& v + y &,& \text{U+A761}\\ \text{ǉ} &\to& l + j &,& \text{U+01C9} & \text{℥} &\to& \text{oz} &,& \text{U+2125}\\ \text{ƕ} &\to& h + v &,& \text{U+0195} & \text{ꜩ} &\to& t + z &,& \text{U+A729}\\ \text{ɮ} &\to& l + z &,& \text{U+026E} & \text{ꜵ} &\to& a + o &,& \text{U+A735} \end{array} \]

1.1.4.1.3.2. Ligatures , proper — 2ⁿᵈ set mapping.

This section includes mappings where each ligature is encoded as a character with Combining characters :

\[ \begin{array}{l c l} \overset{\scriptstyle e}{a} \to a + e\ ~,\ \overset{\scriptstyle e}{o} \to o + e\ ~,\ \overset{\scriptstyle e}{u} \to u + e\ ~,\ \overset{\scriptstyle e}{y} \to y + e\ \end{array} \]

As can be seen here , We use U+0364 — Oﬃcial name : Combining Latin Small Letter E — to modify « a » to « aͤ » so We can use It to write : plurals in latin , umlꜷts in german , or « ae » combinations in english — e.g./ « algaͤ » , « muͤtter » , « paͤdophilia » , « formulaͤ » , « larvaͤ » , « antennaͤ » , « buͤcher » , « fuͤße » , « kuͤhe » , « encyclopaͤdia » , « haͤmophilia » , « subpoenaͤ » , « aͤtiology » , « Grotesquͤ » , & c..

1.1.4.2. Ligatures , extended.

Ligatures extended are provided by the « junicode » , ergo ; They’re classiﬁed as « extended » , moreover  usage of Extended-class ligatures are dependent on the font , How-ever ; Main ones are : ct & oö.

1.1.4.2.1. Ligatures , extended mapping.

Duͤ to Them being results of the font — & not a New Unicode character — We won’t map Them formally , since They are — already — search compatible.

1.2. Rules of :

1.2.1. spaces ,

While writing Punctuation marks — apart from the period , der tildes , & ellipsis — all get seperated by a Non-break space to preserve the integrity of the text.

1.2.2. periods ,

Periods shall be used only when to ﬁnish the thought , other Use cases are detailed hereinunder.

1.2.2.1. on use in abbrevations ,

1.2.2.2. on It’s use as Decimal point ,

1.2.2.3. on using It within neﬆed parts.

1.2.3. sentence topogrophy ,

A sentence has a Topological shape , in which It will go up & down or ﬆꜽ in the line — according to the wishes of the ꜷthor , becꜷse ; a sentence is not a Flat sequͤnce of words but rather a terrain with rises , valleys , & cliﬀs , How-ever  The generation of previous hath said that : « A sentence has a : subject , verb , & object. » , alas — I object ; surely : It mꜽ be truͤ for Them but for Those who wish to practice My syntax shall know that a sentence is a tꝏl of communication used to : convey an idea — which can live as long as ꜷthor intends It to — & transmit the Inherent meaning of what is in the ꜷthor’s head , one ought for to parse  that a sentence lives by It’s Own rules and one muﬆ give It’s Own Eco-syﬆem , for ‘tis It’s Own Little world , moreover ; as an ꜷthor writes It as an Eco-syﬆem , so shall a reader read It as one — They mꜽn’t read or skim over It to miss the beꜷty It contains , to explain It clearly  We need to Under-ﬆand what It means to lꝏk , & — consequͤntly — read & / or write , a sentence , wherefore ; We shall ﬆart by seeing what It [ a sentence ] is : a Naturally-decꜽing organism that gets heꜹier the longer the It lives , to speak More clearly : a sentence leans into Lower sentences the longer It runs and what ﬆarts as L⁰ can quickly become L⁻⁴ if not taken care , therefore ; Our goal is to Re-set the sentence’s level to keep It going and wield the power It gives Us.

1.2.3.1. on level of depth ,

One ought for to Under-ﬆand that the deeper the clause is so shall be the Punctuation level — It [ a sentence ] rises , falls , breathes , branches , & eventually decays if not cared for , in Other words ; if one were keep ﬆuﬃng clauses into a sentence without shaping Them properly — by letting It breathe & gain energy back — the sentence will — inevitably — die — so that It’ll collapse under It’s Own weight and becomes unable to carry Any Other Clꜷse-form , like a biome which can’t carry more than It already can , therefore  We — vertically — rise or dug deeper into This biome to free It , so that It can carry More Life-forms — this Very principle applies here , tꝏ , meaning ; if We free not the sentence It will hꜹe to meet with It’s end — the period. The level , in This context , is akin to Vertical digging or adding levels , such that We are either going down & up , How-ever ; one mꜽ need to remember that They’re tꝏls for Us to use , which means : We can use Them to go lower or higher without Any consequͤnces.

1.2.3.2. on freeing the sentence ,

Semi-colons , Terti-colons , & Quarti-colons are , as will be demonﬆrated , used to free the sentence to Their Respective level of depth , one mꜽ ask : « Why are They needed ? » , and to that I shall answer : We crack the sentence open so that It won’t collapse under It’s Own Sub-clauses , since ; Our sentences will be created by using a Single idea getting broken down. To free a sentence : a  needs 1  , a  needs 1 ; , a ; needs ,s or clꜷses , whenceforth ; We can sꜽ that They’re markers of cutting , and the cut It is that We place Them when We ﬁnish the Previous clꜷse — hence We muﬆ put connectors , & adverbs , before this Cutting mark.

We can create to diagram to see how It functions :

\[ \underbrace{\text{text}}_{\text{Previous text}} ~\underbrace{\text{,}}_{\text{Indicator of Level-change comma}}\ ~ \underbrace{\text{How-ever}}_{\text{adverb or any Other seperator}}\ \underbrace{;}_{\text{mark}}\ \underbrace{\text{text contin}\overset{\scriptstyle e}{\text{u}}\text{s}}_{\text{New level's text}} \]

1.2.3.2.1. by Semi-colons , Terti-colons , & Quarti-colons.

One shall lꝏk in the § ( A/( 1.1.1.2. ) ) and see that We hꜹe said that : « when used with an adverb , It frees the sentence from the depth. » , and although It’s of Utmoﬆ verisimilitude ‘twas only the part of the truth , in essence ; job of Semi-colons is to free the sentence not only with adverbs but with Any kind of connector , How-ever  one musn’t take all Semi-colons as marks to free sentences , for They need Another mark — namely : a comma to succeed — without the comma no such Under-taking can be made , whenceforth ; knowing that comma & Semi-colon pair can free the sentence We shall see Some examples for the act , one with adverbs & one without , and the examples are these : « , yet ; » , « , How-ever ; » , « , surely ; » , « , verily ; » , « , moreover ; » , « , alas ; » , & c. , to talk about Quarti-colons & Terti-colons  basically : These do the Same job at Higher levels , to elaborate further  a Terti-colon frees the sentence from the depths where Semi-colons reside , Mean-while  a Quarti-colon frees the sentence from a collection of Terti-colons.

1.2.3.2.2. by.

1.2.3.2.3. by Quarti-colons.

1.2.3.2.4. by dashes.

1.2.3.3. on writing & reading.

How that is so can be explained in This wꜽ , more-or-less : think of text as a Single block , but You can’t keep All things in Your mind , ergo We Simply divide It into Biteable chunks to ease , and ; by following This example We can keep Under-ﬆanding the writing.

1.2.3.3.1. Reading.

Each person reads a sentence diﬀerently and uses the Same tꝏls diﬀerently , tꝏ , as in ; think about 2 people reading the Same Exact sentence , the wꜽ They experience : the rise & fall of the sentence , the Neﬆed layers , the levels , & more will differ greatly becꜷse even if We , as humans , are given the Same grammar & tꝏls , the Mental journey through a sentence will vary based on the reader’s : experience , rhythm , focus , & even mood.

We will use Lⁿ to show the topography of the sentence. We mꜽ hꜹe — since even the depth It-self can be Under-ﬆꝏd in 2 Different ways — 2 interpretations ; one is : treating It going higher , e.g./ a Quarti-colon being mountains which seperate the plateꜷs — which We will be doing , and Other one is : treating It going lower , e.g./ a Quarti-colon Actually being a canyon to seperate 2 ideas — inﬆead of Our interpretation here which will be using It as a Mountain-range.

1.2.3.3.1.1. Basics of topography.

Becꜷse We will be using the Firﬆ interpretation We ought to Only deal with It , How-ever ; what is being said here is valid for Other interpretation , tꝏ , ergo  in This model Firﬆ We shall mention the basis of a sentence.

While reading We hꜹe to give attention to : Major-logical blocks , Logical blocks , blocks , & Smaller elements that are born out of each ꜷthor’s ﬆyle , let Me explain more ;

1.2.3.3.1.1.1. The ﬆart.

All sentences ﬆart with a Simple road , the entrance to the area , and ; the more You go in It , the more You’ll ﬁnd Your-self in a New terrain — each New word adds a New & Uniquͤ ﬆyle to It , therefore  We can sꜽ that a sentence is Complex & Beꜷtiful as It is long , and a reader ought to read the beꜷty in It while trꜹersing through It’s foreﬆ , moreover  before We ﬆart walking into the Land-scape We need to get the writer’s help : what do I mean by this , You mꜽ wonder , let Me explain  when We ﬆart reading writer will hꜹe left Us a place to reﬆ & see the front ‘ere We ﬆart walking into Their Dense writing — take the ﬆart of This sentence for example , « All sentences ﬆart with a Simple road , the entrance to the area , and ; » , and You will see that before We ﬆarted reading It writer didn’t go to Diﬀerent levels but inﬆead left Us a : clꜷse , then 1-level deep clꜷse , and then ﬆarted the journey , verily  this is how It’s supposed to be : We Firﬆ get Our reﬆ and Under-ﬆand the quality of the road , writing , environment , biome , culture of the area , & so forth and then ﬆart walking , as We can see ; the writer of This sentence : ﬆarted with a Straight line , made a Little detour to show that This writer uses depth a lot , & sent Us Our wꜽ after explaining what the road ahead of Us awaits with a Simple connection , namely — « , and ; » , which ; helped Us to lꜽ out Our Mental expectations betwixt the Real ﬆart of the sentence & what We mꜽ hꜹe expected.

1.2.3.3.1.1.2. The Quarti-colon.

The Quarti-colon , in This model , is Our Gate-wꜽ to the Next idea — think of It This wꜽ  a sentence ﬆarts and We ﬆarted trꜹeling on the path , How-ever  We can’t Juﬆ visit places easily , for They’re seperated by the writer’s Logical neﬆing , so ; We search for the Higheﬆ peak ﬁrﬆ — and , for the sake of This passage , We shall make It a Quarti-colon , alas ; one muﬆ note that It can be Any-where in the text — and came across a Quarti-colon , now ; that is an indication from writer to Us that the sentence ﬆarts here , and since It seperates the ﬆart from the journey We mark It as Our entrance into the sentence , what It shows to Us  is that We are at the fꝏt of a mountain to Another place while showing that We are no longer bound to the logic of the Previous part , the Starting clꜷse — so We pass It , walk over It , and ; after passing such mountain We are at the Other side of the text , and now We can continuͤ walking freely becꜷse This Quarti-colon landed Us to a plateꜷ seperate from the Previous clꜷse & the clꜷse after that , surely ; We mꜽ or mꜽ not see Another Mountain-range in front of Us — but that doesn’t change the fact that We are in the Heart-lands of This idea the ꜷthor wanted to seperate , to speak clearly  when We read a Quarti-colon We witness 2 things : previous Major-logical block ending & Current Major-logical block ﬆarting It’s part in the writing , in short  reading across a Quarti-colon means You’ve summited the High ground , lꝏked down at the view — and now You’re walking into an Entirely New biome , think of It as the Mountain-barrier dividing france & spain : both are on the Same continent — in This metaphor : the sentence — but seperate — in This metaphor : Diﬀerent Logical-blocks — geographies.

1.2.3.3.1.1.3. The Terti-colon.

After getting into a New Major-logical block We mꜽ or mꜽ not be greeted by Another Logical-block , in This case — shall We sꜽ : let Us meet the Terti-colon , How-ever ; since You Already know how They work I will explain It brieﬂy , henceforth  one mꜽ take Them as the equivalent of Quarti-colon at a Smaller scale.

1.2.3.3.1.1.4. The Smaller seperations.

These , without an argument , Alwꜽs go lower — and is independent from the model.

1.2.3.3.1.2. Explanations.

Although I hꜹe said that Terti-colon is followed by a Quarti-colon , that is a Brief & Non-sequitur explanation , becꜷse ; the truth is more complicated : a sentence can hꜹe a Terti-colon without a Quarti-colon ⸺ but ⸻ alas ‘tis not of Whole truth either , becꜷse ; if a sentence — already — has a Quarti-colon then towards the end a New Quarti-colon mꜽ be used for Terti-colon since It’s a Logically-diﬀerent block — to convey the meaning : It — naturally — is a seperation mark that has : potential to bear New Terti-colons & denote the New Major-logical block of the sentence , therefore ; We ought to consider with Utmoﬆ carefulness when deciding to put a Quarti-colon that doesn’t open to a Terti-colon ⸻ never vice versa , since a Quarti-colon is Higher level — or hꜹe a Semi-colon without a Terti-colon or comma , moreover  the interpretation model Only works for These High-level-block markers and not Smaller seperations ﬆated hereinabove , since They are not the text It-self , to clarify : We take Them [ the Bigger seperations ] , in This model , to Some-thing to pass over , How-ever ; after We pass , We are back to the Same level — e.g./ if They are in L⁻² then We Re-turn to L⁻² — of the clꜷse It-self in It’s Logical block , to explain further ; the Punctuation marks for Logical blocks doesn’t change , but rather is a wall , in the text while Smaller seperations — Almoﬆ alwꜽs — change It.

1.2.3.3.2. Writing.

1.2.3.3.2.1. Basics of writing.

As a writer Our task is to give the reader a Fꝏt-holding before They ﬆart Their journey , and this — consequͤntly — means that We can’t Immediately ﬆart taking the reader into Diﬀerent areas without Properly giving Them a Starting road & a village to take resources.

1.2.3.3.3. Exercises & examples.

To Under-ﬆand the discipline We hꜹe learned the Ideal theory behind It so far , alas ; one also need to experience the Real-theory part of It , leﬆ We make the miﬆake of not immersing Our-selves , moreover  the One ought for to take care that the following examples & exercises are in on Them-selves sentences and not collection of Multiple sentences , i.e./ a paragraph , and ﬆand alone.

1.2.3.3.3.1. Examples

To render the surface of the sentence while reading or writing , We ﬁrﬆ need to Under-ﬆand It properly , ergo ; We ought for to read & De-cipher Some sentences.

1.2.3.3.3.1.1. Basic example.

We shall Firﬆ ﬆart with a Basic sentence — « New User interface of ProtonVPN ( Desktop ) application is not — exactly — suitable for My taste , however  They did deliver — what I would call — a Beautiful Eye-candy , as in ; not , exactly , practical , but  Some-how , looks & feels good. » — and ﬆart mapping It’s topography.

We ﬆart Our journey from This part : « New User interface of ProtonVPN ( Desktop ) application is not — exactly — suitable for My taste » , and by the end of It we Already went a level deep and rose back , twice. Let’s form It as thus , when We combine all , We get This :

1.2.3.3.3.1.2. Mid example.

We shall move to a Slightly more Complex sentence , How-ever ; I will be giving only the results.

« There were 3 people known as « jehan , le cordouanier » in the 13ᵗʰ cc. who were involved in the production of shoes ⸺ namely , production of shoes made out of ﬁne Cordovan leather , How-ever ; cordouaniers are people who make shoes , not repair Them — This diﬆinction shall be known ⸺ during the reign of philip the 4ᵗ ʰ ( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_IV_le_Bel ) — We know This information from THE BꝎK OF THE TAX OF PARIS. dated 129 2 ( https://archive.org/details/parissousphilipp00grau ) , moreover  to talk about Them We ﬁrﬆ hꜹe to know Their ﬆatus , therefore — for 1ˢᵗ jehan  He was ﬆationed in Barillerie ﬆree t ( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rue_de_la_Barillerie_(Paris) ) — a Former ﬆreet on the Île de la Cité in Paris , located within the boundaries of Current dꜽ’s 1ˢᵗ & 4ᵗʰ arr. , moreover ; It began & ended at : Quai Desaix-Quai de l’Horloge & ended at Quai des Orfèvres-Rue du Marché-Neuf — and owed 12 deniers ⸻ and by using a research ꜷthored by ridolf , leonardo dated 2019/02 ( https://www.lem.sssup.it/WPLem/files/2017-14.pdf ) — We can get the Spot-price conversion using Metal value only — after We remove Some diﬀerences , which ; leꜹes Us with 2.6 sous/dꜽ and — by applying conversion rate and turning 1 sou to 12 deniers — We can deduce the Current equivalent — by applying To-dꜽ’s Silver prices to That-dꜽ’s Silver weight , for a French denier that would be 1.7g r ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolingian_monetary_system#Charlemagne's_reforms ) , and reach the № of 20.4gr silver — which is 21.02 EUR ⸻ to the ﬆate , to serve sources ; He is on , excluding PRÉFACE , p. 135 of the bꝏk under the title « La rue de la Barillerie. » with His Seq. № being 2 , to continuͤ on — for 2ⁿᵈ jehan  He was performing His work on the rue de la Calandr e ( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rue_de_la_Calandre ) — a Demolished ﬆreet like others , duͤ to reforms made in 19 cc. — all the wꜽ to the Saint-michiel square ⸻ in Current france : place Louis-Lépine ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Place_Louis_Lépine ) , in Other words ; if You were to visit To-dꜽ’s prefecture of police on the Île de la Cité — betwixt rue de la cité & boulevard du palais , just oﬀ place Louis-Lépine — You’d be ﬆanding roughly where due de la Calendre once ran ⸻ of That time , to liﬆ speciﬁcs ; He owed the ﬆate 3 sous , which is 36 deniers — and by running the Same calculations It’s 63.06 EUR To-dꜽ — by conversion applied , to serve sources ; He is on , excluding PRÉFACE , p. 141 of the bꝏk under the title « La Calendre jusques à la place Saint-Michiel. » with His Seq. № being 30 , and laﬆly — for 3ʳᵈ jehan  He was making shoes on the other side of the — a ﬆreet connected to a church , demolished in 1793 during French revolutio n ( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Église_de_la_Madeleine-en-la-Cité ) — Madeleine ﬆreet , moreover ; He owed 5 sous , or 60 deniers , in — by Same math , that’s 105.10 EUR in To-dꜽ’s money — taxes to the ﬆate , to serve sources ; He is on , excluding PRÉFACE , p. 142 of the bꝏk under the title « LA PARROISSE DE LA MADALEINNE (1). En l'autre renc de celle rue méesmes (2). » with His Seq. № being 10 , now that We hꜹe talked about Them  about more identiﬁcation  if jehans continuͤd His career in paͤri , They might appear in one of the Later — perhaps under a Slightly Different designation , since names & spellings oft varied , becꜷse an individual might be liﬆed with as Trade-man in That year and as a Shoe-maker in Another — liﬆs , alas ; without a Fixed Family-name ‘tis impossible to — conclusively — identify all of Those jehans beyond 1292 , since no Speciﬁc Family-records or Personal charters survived to name Him or His family — which is normal for artisans of that era , wherefore ; We neither don’t know Their wives’ nor Any characteriﬆics of Their Genealogical details , leꜹing the details in dark , in essence  these 3 jehans as Professional High-quality Shoe-makers artisans from paͤri enter the Hiﬆorical records as names on a Tax liﬆ , e.g./ a Snap-shot of a Working paͤrĳian in 1292 , along with other 101 cordouaniers , How-ever ; even if Their Personal ﬆories — i.e./ pains , joys , things I would hate about Them — Their Hiﬆorical Fꝏt-print lived on for a Considerable amount of time , for the ﬆreets They walked & the shoes They made are , in a sense , Their legacy. » and when We decode It , We get the text henceforth written : « |L⁰There were 3 people known as « jehan , le cordouanier » in the 13ᵗʰ cc. who were involved in the production of shoes |L⁻¹⸺ namely , production of shoes made out of ﬁne Cordovan leather |L⁻¹, How-ever ; cordouaniers are people who make shoes , not repair Them|L⁻¹ — This diﬆinction shall be known⸺ |L⁰during the reign of philip the 4ᵗ ʰ |L⁻¹( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippe_IV_le_Bel ) |L⁻⁰— We know This information from THE BꝎK OF THE TAX OF PARIS. dated 129 2 L⁻¹( https://archive.org/details/parissousphilipp00grau ) |L⁺⁴, moreover  |L⁰to talk about Them We ﬁrﬆ hꜹe to know Their ﬆatus |L⁺³, therefore — for 1ˢᵗ jehan  L⁰He was ﬆationed in Barillerie ﬆree t |L⁻¹ ( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rue_de_la_Barillerie_(Paris) )|L⁰ |L⁻¹ — a Former ﬆreet on the Île de la Cité in Paris |L⁻¹, located within the boundaries of Current dꜽ’s 1ˢᵗ & 4ᵗʰ arr. |L⁻¹, moreover ; It began & ended at : Quai Desaix-Quai de l’Horloge & ended at Quai des Orfèvres-Rue du Marché-Neuf |L⁰— and owed 12 deniers |L⁻¹⸻ and by using a research ꜷthored by ridolf , leonardo dated 2019/02 |L⁻²( https://www.lem.sssup.it/WPLem/files/2017-14.pdf )|L⁻¹ |L⁻² — We can get the Spot-price conversion using Metal value only |L⁻¹— after We remove Some diﬀerences |L⁻¹, which ; leꜹes Us with 2.6 sous/dꜽ and |L⁻²— by applying conversion rate and turning 1 sou to 12 deniers |L⁻¹— We can deduce the Current equivalent |L⁻¹— by applying To-dꜽ’s Silver prices to That-dꜽ’s Silver weight |L⁻², for a French denier that would be 1.7g r |L⁻³( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolingian_monetary_system#Charlemagne's_reforms )|L⁻² |L⁻¹, and reach the № of 20.4gr silver |L⁻²— which is 21.02 EUR |L⁰⸻ to the ﬆate |L⁰, to serve sources ; He is on |L⁻¹, excluding PRÉFACE , p. 135 of the bꝏk under the title « La rue de la Barillerie. » with His Seq. № being 2 |L⁺³, to continuͤ on — for 2ⁿᵈ jehan  |L⁰He was performing His work on the rue de la Calandr e |L⁻¹( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rue_de_la_Calandre ) |L⁰— a Demolished ﬆreet like others , duͤ to reforms made in 19 cc. |L⁰— all the wꜽ to the Saint-michiel square|L⁻¹ ⸻ in Current france : place Louis-Lépine |L⁻²( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Place_Louis_Lépine ) |L⁻¹, in Other words ; if You were to visit To-dꜽ’s prefecture of police on the Île de la Cité |L⁻²— betwixt rue de la cité & boulevard du palais |L⁻², just oﬀ place Louis-Lépine |L⁻¹— You’d be ﬆanding roughly where due de la Calendre once ran |L⁰⸻ of That time |L⁰, to liﬆ speciﬁcs ; He owed the ﬆate 3 sous |L⁰, which is 36 deniers |L⁻¹— and by running the Same calculations It’s 63.06 EUR To-dꜽ |L⁰— by conversion applied |L⁰, to serve sources ; He is on |L⁻¹, excluding PRÉFACE , p. 141 of the bꝏk under the title « La Calendre jusques à la place Saint-Michiel. » with His Seq. № being 30 |L⁺³, and laﬆly — for 3ʳᵈ jehan  He was making shoes on the other side of the |L⁻¹— a ﬆreet connected to a church , demolished in 1793 during French revolutio n |L⁻²( https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Église_de_la_Madeleine-en-la-Cité )|L⁻¹ |L⁰ — Madeleine ﬆreet |L⁰, moreover ; He owed 5 sous |L⁻¹, or 60 deniers , in |L⁻¹— by Same math |L⁻¹, that’s 105.10 EUR in To-dꜽ’s money |L⁰— taxes to the ﬆate |L⁰, to serve sources ; He is on |L⁻¹, excluding PRÉFACE , p. 142 of the bꝏk under the title « LA PARROISSE DE LA MADALEINNE (1). En l'autre renc de celle rue méesmes (2). » with His Seq. № being 10 |L⁺⁴, now that We hꜹe talked about Them  about more identiﬁcation |L⁺³ |L⁰if jehans continuͤd His career in paͤri , |L⁰They might appear in one of the Later |L⁻¹— perhaps under a Slightly Different designation |L⁻², since names & spellings oft varied |L⁻¹, becꜷse an individual might be liﬆed with as Trade-man in That year and as a Shoe-maker in Another |L⁰— liﬆs |L⁰, alas ; without a Fixed Family-name ‘tis impossible to |L⁻¹— conclusively — identify all of Those jehans beyond 1292 |L⁰, since no Speciﬁc Family-records or Personal charters survived to name Him or His family |L⁰— which is normal for artisans of that era |L⁰, wherefore ; We neither don’t know Their wives’ nor Any characteriﬆics of Their Genealogical details |L⁰, leꜹing the details in dark |L⁺³, in essence  these 3 jehans as Professional High-quality Shoe-makers artisans from paͤri enter the Hiﬆorical records as names on a Tax liﬆ |L⁻¹, i.e./ a Snap-shot of a Working paͤrĳian in 1292 , along with other 101 cordouaniers |L⁰, How-ever ; even if Their Personal ﬆories |L⁻¹— e.g./ pains , joys , things I would hate about Them |L⁰— Their Hiﬆorical Fꝏt-print lived on for a Considerable amount of time |L⁰, for the ﬆreets They walked & the shoes They made are |L⁻¹, in a sense , Their legacy. » , and as can be seen here ‘tis a very Simple sentence Mainly located around the L⁰ depth that Seldom dips in complexity if not for Side notes or sources , verily ; moﬆ of sentences that aren’t recursive in nature are formed This wꜽ and will be written This wꜽ , for ; a Gꝏd writer : this is an Exemplary sentence on what needs to do while writing a bꝏk — or Any other form of activity that is done by exercising the art of writing — to give readers ease of reading or digeﬆion after using a sentence as shown in the § hereinunder , and Gꝏd reader : This sentence shall not be Their Comfort zone , for It’s — merely — surface level information no diﬀerent from reading how to make a cꝏkie.

1.2.3.3.3.1.3. Complex example.

We will now see an example with that has 1 Quarti-colon , How-ever ; It will — moﬆly — reside in deeper Lⁿ levels : « Before I ﬆart to tell Mine honeﬆ & moﬆly — as much as one can be — unbiased thoughts about This chapter along with General arc of the ﬆory I feel the need to ﬆate the fact that ; what I say — under any circumﬆances , whatsoever — shan’t be taken as an attack on the mangaka or translators who poured Their eﬀort for to deliver Us this Literary piece or an Oﬀensive comment made and written in Bad faith , what I ﬆate is not guaranteed to be the Objective truth nor what mangaka has in Their minds , and an attempt to change My comment’s readers’ minds about the content in Any form or shape — as , underﬆandably , everyone can not not hꜹe Their own conclusions & expectations about what They hꜹe read and imagine to read in the future — therefore My comment ought to be taken as a Friendly reminder , in case someone wants to know what is My reason for writing down These thoughts. To ﬆate My thoughts plainly  ﬁrﬆly  we shall ﬆart with talking about the schedule of release , whereof I speak is — I think — 1 month at a time as proven by the ult. upload , is — My ﬆore of words is not vaﬆ enough to ﬆate It clearly as I want , however — sitting near the slow end of what I perceive as Ideal Release times , and sꜹe for the possibility that mangaka has Other projects or Personal problems I hꜹe not heard of , which is — in an Utterly & Unimaginably way , a circumﬆance that causes nothing but unpropitiousness beyond , & I don’t say this with Ill intentions , what I expect from such a manga with High promise , and secondly  I think We need to talk about what has happened in [ Ch. 19 ] pp. 22-23 between , Mine utmoﬆ apologizes for hꜹing the audacity of forgetting the Main character’s & the girl’s name , these 2 people , as what I think — that’s happening and / or going to happen in the Next chapter , is a ploy played by , again — Mine apologies for forgetting His name , the boy with Closed eyes againﬆ the Main character after the plan of using Monﬆer scent to get His girls’ — I mean the healer , the loli , and the Long-Haired warrior & not the Closed eyes’ own Loli girl- failed what He might hꜹe thought possible due to fact that Our Main character is an " Carrier " who , in that world’s expectation — weirdly — is taken as a weak class , shan’t be This powerful to repel such a swarm of monﬆers ﬁlled to the brim , coming from everywhere — therefore , as seen in [ Do. ] pp. 5-6 giving Us a clue to extrapolate what is — which I think I explained earlier — His plan , the girl that approached Our Main Character with the pretext of " I’D FEEL BAD IF I DIDN’T REPAY THIS FAVOR. " is actually inconceivable to be thought as anything other than an act of espionage or getting information for blackmailing — whence I deduce this is from the logic ﬆarting with the fact that Plasma oxytocin increases [ with ] the human sexual response ( Carmichael et al. , 1987 Jan;64(1):27-31. doi: 10.1210/jcem-64-1-27. PMID: 3782434. ) therefore , as I am pointing to there — yes , increases oxytocin which causes an increase in truﬆ to [ other ] humans ( Kosfeld et. al , 2005 : Oxytocin increases truﬆ in humans — University of Zurich ) , which traces back to Real World examples of Sexual intercourse used by Intelligence agencies , moﬆ notably being , Miniﬆerium für Staatssicherheit with , what is known as colloquially , " Honeypots " or " Honey Traps " — targeting Our Main character , whom I wish all but fate that is darker than forgetting that Your keys are inside Your pockets & not forgotten inside home , thence , with all that said , It ultimately Mine hypothesis on what’s going to happen in Next chapters is ; She is getting , or got , coerced into providing Her own body , by Closed eyes , to — I , unfortunately , say this without a Formal reasoning that can be traced back logically , tarnish the reputation of Our Main character for the " pure " girls He [ Closed eyes ] thinks He will get the people I’ve liﬆed before , ( funnily enough ) not knowing that the girls are — to explain It Quite mildly — more than " excited " to hꜹe a Bodily contact that is more than ﬁghting back-to-back , won’t create a drama revolving around Him hꜹing a New paﬆ with Another loli , maybe other than the Long-Haired girl saying " Stop , ahaha. " in a tone. I wish My beﬆ wishes to translators & a pleasant day for the mangaka , and news that will make Mine aﬆonishing respect for My brothers-in-manga cry from not but sadness but from happiness. » , and as can be seen There is a Single Quarti-colon opening to 2 Terti-colons that are Deeply recursive in nature and that is all We hꜹe to show here.

1.2.3.3.3.2. Exercises.

For examples We shall use My Status updates written in Other pages — once done , You shall teﬆ Thine answer by Your-self.

1.2.3.3.3.2.1. Basic exercise.

Written exclusively for This exercise : « I need to buy  chips , cookies , Dried fruit ; coffee , Sparkling water , juice ; dumplings , Pizza rolls , Hash browns  Dish soap , sponges , gloves ; detergent , Fabric softener ; spray , Plug-ins  litter , Wet food , Dry food ; candles , bandages , Instant raamen. »

1.2.3.3.3.2.2. Mid exercise.

<a href="/p/p1502.html">From p.1502 / Status update № 15 / § 4</a> : « The words , the hereinabove lines I speak of , ﬆated there were written when I closed Mine Ocular organs to lꝏk at In-side — to lꝏk freely — and read this — ‘twas a Text ﬁle , of Suﬃcient magnitude to reach 300 or 400 lines , I read , and ; in there was written Those words , They were the Firﬆ lines in this Little mind of Mine. I am , so to speak honeﬆly , terriﬁed of Mine Own mind when I ﬆop thinking about Some-thing consciously , I — only — get to see the horrors Some-times , Really Weird ones at that — happening in under a second , as in : I don’t even need to close Mine eyes , all I hꜹe to do is Simply wait or let It run It’s course To-wards My brain with no regards to My Mental Well-being , verily ; why It ought for to care for My Mental Well-being , when I don’t — answer is as thus : It needn’t care for My facilities , for They belong to Me and not It , moreover ; Every-thing hereinafter written will be from the bottom of Mine heart , without editing. Aforementioned horrors I see when I close , or don’t close Mine eyes , I see such ﬆuﬀ : a head made out of ﬆone , 3 meters in height , with 8 or more Spider-alike legs , with hair of Great length — this was what I saw , the face was a face of a man in His 40 to 50s , [ ‘twas ] was white , since It was made out of ﬆone , verily ; seeing such depiction was not only horrfying but also unsettling , since I ask My-self : « How can It be made up from Mine imagination ? » and to That inquiry the response I’ve — alwꜽs — come for to is as thus : « No such Under-taking is done by Mine own , ‘twas — simply — an event of reality — neither duͤ to Me nor becꜷse of Me , but becꜷse of the Primal Me. » and I am happy with This answer for It answers My wonders : « why shall I not fear It ? » I lꝏk to My right , I see nꜷght — lꝏk to My left , I see nꜷght here , tꝏ , intereﬆingly ; ‘tis problem of Mine is not limited to My Ludicrous eﬀorts to ﬆꜽ alive , nꜽ ; ‘twasn’t [ becꜷse ] of that — Real cꜷse is from loﬆ of information , I type , yet ; I forget , I even forgot what I wrote while typing that part since My memory oft fails Me as It’s — simply — a Meat-puppet , [ a ] Floating a [ P ]rotein[ - ]bar : telling Me to believe in It’s supremacy. ».

1.2.3.3.3.2.3. Complex exercise

<a href="/p/p1502.html">From p.1502 / Status update № 16</a> : « To-dꜽ , yet again , in My dream I had hurt Some-one — with This time It being over Him ﬆealing My cat — by Firﬆ making My cat rip His pocket out and come out of It by whiﬆling ⸻ since the guy tꝏk My cat that was lꜽing next to Me by putting It in His Left pocket , Despicable liar told Me to lꝏk Some-where , alas ; unbeknownﬆ to Him This Strꜽ-cat — actually — is conditioned to come to Me using My mouth to create noises ⸻ and after that I tꝏk a Street sign I hꜹe in My posession and with It’s corner I hit the 40-years-old man — despite Him telling Me to « Stop ! » I liﬆened not to — cꜷsing Extreme trꜷma on His ﬆomach with Heꜹy bleeding until He admits that He thought I was a ﬆranger trying to kidnap the Strꜽ-cat to which I replied with : I live here , and ﬆopped attacking after bringing Him near to the edge of death with My Relentless attack , verily  ‘twas His fꜷlt to : ﬆeal Some-thing from Me & think a girl was only a nuisance He needed to deal with without harming Me , and what’s — objectively — worse is that He thought no harm could come from Me , How-ever ; I came for Him , for I won’t leꜹe My cat to hands of the ﬆranger — no matter how long He spent in This place , ‘twas My cat , nonetheless ; I wish I had killed Him inﬆead of letting Him go , and — although I didn’t lꝏk at Him when I turned My back and left , I watched It the Firﬆ time walking awꜽ with My cat — inﬆead of watching Him walk awꜽ I wish I could silence Him For-ever as He deserved — I don’t know what happened to the cat , though I presume It followed Me on My wꜽ until I left It’s area , How-ever  some mꜽ sꜽ : « But that’s not Proportional Self-defence or reaction , that’s not right ! » , and to that — Mine interlocutors — I sꜽ : ‘tisn’t My problem , for might makes right , verily ; why I oughn’t use all of My power to eradicate an enemy , to elaborate My ﬆance ; let Us imagine : people ⸻ of 3 tiers — friend , neutral , enemy ⸻ annoys — who has , for the sake of This explanation , has Immense power — Me — by sꜽing : « Your writing is juﬆ You huﬃng on Your fart. » , « Your drawings are of Horrendous quality. » , « You’re an Attention-seeker. » , & « You collect data to do marketing , and I support This person’s words who accuses You. » — and now that We hꜹe an event , We mꜽ commence to Under-ﬆand My responses to each one respectively , ﬁrﬆly  for friends My response to such words would be Utter disbelief , since Some-one knowing Me shan’t sꜽ these — in the end :I wouldn’t — particularly — act on Them , for They know not better to judge Me better than Their Petty rules over syntax , How-ever ; if Those words accusing My speech would get targeted by neutrals or foes then I would press My thumbs againﬆ Their eyes to blind Them and proclaim : « You don’t deserve to see Any-wꜽs , I — merely — correct the Mis-take in reality ⸺ You claiming to be able to see while You — clearly — can’t. » and leꜹe It at that , secondly  for My pals who utters words about My drawing I would ask Them : « How can I make It better , then ? » , and wait for Their responses — unto Them I grant the beneﬁt of doubt to show that They weren’t — simply — trying to defame Me , alas ; should a neutral tell Me such thing , I would expect a reason behind It — for one oughtn’t be so harsh without a reason , and — depending on Their profession and reason — I mꜽ react same as how I would react to : My friends , Mine enemies , or Some-where in-between , none-the-less ; for Mine enemies , depending on Their reasoning being of help or defamation , I would either liﬆen to Them & Dis-regard later or skin Them alive in front of Their Family members to show My Greateﬆ New Art-piece — Them , thirdy  I would interrogate My Social-relationship partners about Their ﬆatement , asking Them : « Why You think I am one ? » , until They respond — the answer would either mean They’re jeﬆing or want to make fun of Me , and — respectively — that means I either join Them in Their jeﬆ on Equal fꝏtting or throw Them out , one the other hand ; if an Unknown person , to Me — personally , told Me such thing I would hold Their cheeks and ﬆuﬀ Carbonated drinks in Their Nose-thrils while lꝏking at Their eyes , to elabore ; if They were My nemesis I would — simply — cut Their throat — for They’re unworthy of Mine attention , since They believe I live for Their attention , and laﬆly  for Those who I thought Them as friends but alas supported Some-one else while I was banned from speaking : They shall hꜹe the explanation of Utmoﬆ logic delivered with Objective facts I can prove — be Their failing come truͤ , then I ought for to treat Them as enemies becꜷse even if They don’t agree with all of message agreeing with parts of It is same as agreeing with all of It ⸻ to elaborate further on This matter : I — undubitabilis — support things that are not 100 % in line with Me , becꜷse all of Man-kind is diﬀerent — since I know I can’t get Every-one to Unequivocally support My ﬆance , whencefore ; I support ideas & movements that do not 100 % align with My Beﬆ intereﬆs , therefore  one supporting — even partially — Some-thing againﬆ Me is same as supporting It fully becꜷse that’s how humans gather ⸻ which means in This case , be it neutral or friend , those who fail to explain an Out-sider reason are to be taken as enemes , on the Other side ; for Mine enemies in This matter the only thing I would do is to chain Them to a rꝏm and put a Blind-fold on Their eyes ⸺ letting Them drink only water , only to be followed by liﬆening to Their 1ˢᵗ-degree — then 2ⁿᵈ , then 3ʳᵈ , then Other degrees — family’s screams of pain until They die one by one by the people I pꜽ to torture Them ⸺ I would be in Diﬀerent place , oblivous to Their pain , surely ; ‘tis would be of Suﬃcient reaction to them , alas  I possess no capabilites , therefore ; I citate — as I did in <a href="/p/p7302.html">p.7302 / Status update № 4 / § 2 / part « firstly — on having a Corrupt World-view & My kindness getting called " fake " ; »</a> — the words spoken in the past : « Ye have heard that it hath been said, [ « ] Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy. [ » , b ]ut I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; » , and keep My façade of being nice ⸺ without It , that’s — juﬆ — suicide waiting to happen , Socially & Legally speaking , to clarify ; even if I can’t — really — torture Them for fun or to teach Them a lesson each group ﬆill gets a Speciﬁc reaction depending on what They sꜽ or do and My response depends on not only on what was said — an Important thing , on It-self — but who said It and how I categorize Them in the given moment , and that’s the 2ⁿᵈ pillar ⸺ I mꜽ forget what You did to become in a Speciﬁc category but I don’t forget what You are , moreover  that explains why I believe not in critics — even if I hate russia , india , pakiﬆan , china , & so forth — of : israel , russia , america , india , pakiﬆan , china , union European , & more , for example ; take the Israelian Counter-terrorism operations , where people attribute attacks of a Terroriﬆ organization to Them — given power by the people living there , not — simply — bombing hospitals or schꝏls or homes but inﬆead uses Precision missiles on Speciﬁc locations — despite Every-one keep being Anti-sematic and claim Self-sabotage Hospital attacks were Actually theirs — is Some-thing that I can not parse , to explain ; if Every-one Currently thinks I do It already , why not Actually do It and deﬆroy Them ⸺ verily , for Some reason They talk about how kids throwing ﬆones shan’t be even detained — but They make a miﬆake , for This dꜽ’s Stone-thrower is To-morrow’s terroriﬆ , by even taking time to detain inﬆead of killing the children to ensure no Other Off-spring of Them mꜽ hold arms , unexplainable — for Me ; They hꜹe Already : done deals , signed deals , and is an Active Arms-provider to Other nations , in Other words : They hꜹe the might & place to use , so a problem rises for Me — if They’re known to do These things why hold short & make the ﬆatus Quo force Their hands to hold down inﬆead of , from the ﬆart — if They had done It , doing as the critics sꜽ and kill Every-one who is againﬆ Them even partially in Terroriﬆ Heart-lands , without a doubt ; if Those people were of Intelligent beings They would ﬆop hꜹing children only to get killed by the mightier and try to switch sides inﬆead of sꜽing : « October 7ᵗʰ attacks were juﬆiﬁed , hꝏrah ! » , juﬆ to — later — sꜽ that : « ‘tis a genocide ! » — even though all of that Terroriﬆ organization’s forces are made out of , or endorsed by , civilians by giving All things from fꝏd to Man-power , moreover ; to those who sꜽ : « If israel did that , They would : allienate even Their Closeﬆ allies , collapse Their Soft power , Invite : sanctions , tribunals , boycotts , & — possibly — war. » , I sꜽ unto You : lꝏk at russia , for They Already do It and Their genocides are Sub-headings in Weﬆern articles , israel is Already boycotted by Anti-semitic alliances & Many ﬆates that are muslim or Muslim-leaning that is not ruled by idiots , & even afghaniﬆan — ruled by taliban — gets touriﬆs , who are You to talk about these , wherefore  the Main point is as thus ; mightier shall use It’s power so that It shall live & weak shall betrꜽ Other weak and help the mightier so that They will live , meaning : Each side is not Inherently Dis-advantaged , weak can’t exiﬆ without might & might can’t exiﬆ without weak , alas ; dealing into explanation of This truth needs another Status update , since ‘tis sentence is ought for to explain My dream & My interpretation. ».

1.2.4. capitalization ,

When capitalizing a word We need to give attention of some Speciﬁc situations.

1.2.4.1. This , that , some , those , & al. ,

The words « This » , « that » , & so forth are only capitalized when They are describers Them-selves , let Me explain  e.g./ think of a sentence : « Then , this Black sun rose. » , as You can see We didn’t capitalize the « this » in That sentence but capitalized « that » while writing « That sentence » — the reason is simple : becꜷse in the Firﬆ sentence the word « sun » Already has a describer and , consequͤntly , this means that « this » in that sentence is a pointer and not describer , How-ever ; if ‘twere a sentence — e.g./ « Then , This sun rose. » — with the described hꜹing no describer , then We’d hꜹe capitalized « this » to indicate that the word « sun » was not a Generic sun but a Speciﬁc sun described by « This » , in essence ; same rule of asking « What kind of thing It is ? » applies here.

1.2.4.2. of describers before a described ,

A describer is a word that explains What kind of a word It is and a described is the word that gets explained by Another word.

1.2.4.2.1. Normal cases.

Take the word « girl » and give It an adjective , e.g./ « tall » or « slim » , and You will see that We ought to capitalize the adjective — the describer — becꜷse It is modifying the girl , moreover ; This rule applies to verbs & adjectives , tꝏ.

1.2.4.2.2. Anormal cases.

In previous §§ We hꜹe said that the describers ought for to capitalized , now We’ll see other Speciﬁc situations.

1.2.4.2.2.1. Multiple describers

1.2.4.2.2.1.1. 2 describers seperated by an ampersand

In case of seperation with ampersand , keep both describers capitalized since They both — ﬆill — modify the verb.

1.2.4.2.2.1.2. 2 describers seperated by a comma

This is a Grammatical miﬆake becꜷse describers are Unbreakable parts of a word , therefore ; one shall ꜹoid This miﬆake , alas  for Those who ask : « But ampersand is acceptable , why ? » , I shall answer as thus : an ampersand , as deﬁned hereinabove , is used for Inseperable ideas or words , ergo ; using ampersand is not of harm , since It Already denotes togetherness — diﬀerent than a Normal « and ».

1.2.4.2.2.1.3. 2 or more describers ﬆacked

All describers get capitalized as usual. On the quͤﬆion of the quͤuͤ ﬆyle : the ﬆyle is ought for to be what a person wants , since the describers’ position matters not.

1.2.4.2.2.2. Seperation with dashes

In case a describer is seperated by a dash , in moﬆ cases It’s an Em-dash for an adverb , then We make the describer Lower-case , becꜷse ; It’s no longer a Valid part of the described , e.g./ « He — alwꜽs — wore that. » and « He Alwꜽs wore that. ».

1.2.4.2.2.3. Reverse order

If a describer is written after the described there are 2 ﬆates to consider before capitalizing It.

1.2.4.2.2.3.1. Adverbs

Adverbs that come after the verb — e.g./ « went swiftly » inﬆead of « Swiftly went » — are not capitalized Duͤ to Them being not a describer but a situation’s Relative ﬆatement to the ꜷthor.

1.2.4.2.2.3.2. Adjectives

Adjectives — especially ones from Other languages , e.g./ « communiquͤ Diplomatiquͤ » — shall keep Their Capitalized ﬆatus Duͤ to Them ﬆill describing the described and not being changed in the meaning , ergo ; one can sꜽ « Tall girl » or « girl Tall » and ﬆill lose nꜷght in terms of Semantic meaning , for both of uses lead to same Out-come : « What kind of girl ? » → « A girl who is tall. ».

1.2.4.3. of connectors ,

Connectors shan’t be capitalized , unless They’re of the class 1.2.4.4.

1.2.4.4. of Compound words ,

Compound words ; if They are made out of : Non-descriptive terms — e.g./ « more-or-less » , « more-&-more » , « none-the-less » , or similar — We don’t capitalize Them or & if They are made out of : Descriptive terms We follow This ﬆandard. Compound words , those with hyphens in Their ﬆomachs , is a class of words which consiﬆs the set of words created using 2 or more words or preﬁxes , to elaborate upon ; a Compound word has 2 parts at minimum — e.g./ « How-ever » , « War-time » , or « Man-alike » — and is — alwꜽs — hypenated. Firﬆ letter of a Compound word muﬆ be capitalized to show that the Firﬆ word is , usually , a describer of the described word , such as  take Our Previous example : War-time , and now read the word again — You shall see that « war- » is a describer of the word « time » , which — in turn — tells Us that when We read the time « time » We Under-ﬆand the « How ? » , « Why ? » , or « What ? » of the term « time » , verily ; this is as We’ve explained in § ( A/( 1.2.4.2. ) ) , ergo  while writing , or reading , a Compound word one ought to ask Them-selves the following quͤﬆions : « Does This word modify the Next word ? » , « What is happening to the 2ⁿᵈ word ? » , or « Is It of Suﬃcient explanation ? » , ergo ; for the word « War-time » the process goes like this : « What kind of time is It ? » → « It’s not a Normal or Unmarked time but rather a time with the property of war. ».

Should a compound word hꜹe more than 2 terms then We only capitalize the 1ˢᵗ term , e.g./ « Mis-under-ﬆanding » , moreover  if We Already hꜹe a Describer-described ﬆring , sꜽ — such as : « Extended class » , and We ﬆill want to add Another term to It , such as « level » , We can simply combine Them to show that , although both are — unmiﬆakebly — describers , a D.-d. ﬆring is the describer It-self , e.g./ « Extended-class level ».

1.2.4.5. of pronouns.

All Personal pronouns muﬆ be capitalized while Other pronouns shall adhere to rule § ( A/( 1.2.4.1. ) ).

1.2.4.6. of other cases.

In Other cases the rules are as follows : Start of a sentence → capitalize , Proper name → don’t capitalize , Acronym → capitalize normally — e.g./ « C.P.u. » for « Central Processing unit » , Titles → follow Original Title-form and if that’s not possible follow Normal Capitalization-rules , Dates → don’t capitalize , Nouns → don’t capitalize , Articles → don’t capitalize , Names of languages → don’t capitalize unless a describer — e.g./ « French language » is Other-wise « french » , Government institutions → don’t capitalize unless They’re in Title form , Planets → don’t capitalize , Start of a quote → capitalize , Start of a sentence inside parentheses → don’t capitalize , Religions & deities → don’t capitalize , Historical events → don’t capitalize unless They’re in Title form , Academic subjects → don’t capitalize unless They’re in Title form , Seasons → don’t capitalize , Directions → don’t capitalize , Job titles → don’t capitalize unless They’re in Title form , Book & Movie & Game titles & others → do not follow the Traditional rules — follow the title It-self ( e.g./ inﬆead of « Nier Re-incarnation » or « A.i. : the Somnium ﬁles » write « NieR Re[in]carnation » or « AI: The Somnium Files » , respectively ) , Brand names → do not follow the Traditional rules — follow the title It-self ( e.g./ inﬆead of « You-tube » or « Mc. Donald’s » write « YouTube » or « McDonald’s » , respectively ) , Days of the week → don’t capitalize , Holidays → don’t capitalize unless They’re in Title form , School grades → don’t capitalize unless a describer , Internet terms → don’t capitalize unless It’s an acronym , Laws and treaties → don’t capitalize unless They’re in Title form , Family titles → don’t capitalize — e.g./ inﬆead of « Hi , Mom. » write « Hi , mom. » , Fictional characters / races → don’t capitalize.

1.2.5. Em-dashes

An Em-dash der Ernﬆiu ordunge is the Main dash that ought for one to use , alas ; as cases needed one mꜽ use the Other ones — Their jobs are liﬆed hereinunder.

1.2.5.1. and Confusing parts.

While using Em-dashes der Ernﬆiu ordunge such problematic results mꜽ occur duͤ to not using Em-dash der Anderiu ordunge.

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 1.1}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{\overbrace{ \text{|L⁰ Text 1} \qquad \text{—} \qquad \text{|L⁻¹ Text} \qquad \text{—} \qquad \text{|L⁰ Text 1}}^{\textstyle\text{L⁰ level Text 1}} \qquad \text{—} \qquad \text{|L⁰ Text 2} }^{\displaystyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

In This example marked as № 1 , as We can see — clearly , that although We hꜹe 2 L⁰ level texts in Our Sentence part , We mꜽ confuse the neﬆing in the diagram provided below.

\[ \overset{ \llap{\scriptstyle{Ex./ 1.2}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \overbrace{ \scriptstyle\text{|L⁰ Sub-text 1.2} \quad \text{—} \quad \text{|L⁻⁰ Sub-text 1.2} }^{\scriptstyle\text{L⁰ level Text 1}} \quad \text{—} \quad \overbrace{ \scriptstyle\text{|L⁰ Sub-text 2.1} \quad \text{—} \quad \text{|L⁰ Sub-text 2.2} }^{\scriptstyle\text{L⁰ level Text 2}} }^{\scriptstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

Problem with This interpretation is that this is not what We meant by when We wrote Our sentence.

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 2.1}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 1.1} \quad \text{—} \quad\text{Sub-text 1.2} }^{\textstyle\text{Text 1}} \quad \text{,} \quad \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 2.1}\quad \text{—} \quad\text{Sub-text 2.2} }^{\textstyle\text{Text 2}} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

Similarly in the example , as We can see — clearly , № 2 a reader might fall into a Similar kind of error.

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{Ex./ 2.2}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \text{L⁰ Text 1} \quad \text{—} \quad \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 1} \quad \text{,} \quad \text{Sub-text 2} }^{\textstyle\text{L⁻¹ Text}} \quad \text{—} \quad \text{L⁰ Text 2} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

Both of These interpretations are ﬁxable by using Em-dash der Anderiu ordunge as shown below ;

for Ex./1 We mꜽ write It as thus :

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 1.3}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{\overbrace{ \text{|L⁰ Text 1} \qquad \text{—} \qquad \text{|L⁻¹ Text} \qquad \text{—} \qquad \text{|L⁰ Text 1}}^{\textstyle\text{L⁰ level Text 1}} \qquad \text{⸺} \qquad \text{|L⁰ Text 2} }^{\displaystyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

and for Ex./2 We hꜹe 2 options to chꝏse from :

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 2.3.1}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 1.1} \quad \text{⸺} \quad\text{Sub-text 1.2} }^{\textstyle\text{Text 1}} \quad \text{,} \quad \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 2.1}\quad \text{—} \quad\text{Sub-text 2.2} }^{\textstyle\text{Text 2}} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 2.3.2}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 1.1} \quad \text{—} \quad\text{Sub-text 1.2} }^{\textstyle\text{Text 1}} \quad \text{,} \quad \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 2.1}\quad \text{⸺} \quad\text{Sub-text 2.2.} }^{\textstyle\text{Text 2}} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

Another Confusing problem arises when We use the « text — text , text » combination to create or sentence and reader sees 2 versions ; Ex./1.1 , the Correct version , & Ex./1.2.1 , the Wrong version :

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{Ex./ 1.1}} \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 1.1} \quad \text{—} \quad \text{Sub-text 1.2} }^{\textstyle\text{L⁰ Text 1}} \quad \text{,} \quad \text{L⁰ Text 2} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{Ex./ 1.2.1}} \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \text{L⁰ Text 1} \quad \text{—} \quad \overbrace{\text{Sub-text 2.1} \quad \text{,} \quad \text{L⁰ Sub-text 2.2 , } }^{\textstyle\text{L⁰ Text 2}} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

therefore ; the readers & writers of This ﬆyle ought to know that for Ex./1.2.1 be meaningful It muﬆ use the version as shown in Ex./1.2.2 :

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{Ex./ 1.2.2}} \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \text{L⁰ Text 1} \quad \text{⸺} \quad \overbrace{\text{Sub-text 2.1} \quad \text{,} \quad \text{L⁰ Sub-text 2.2.} }^{\textstyle\text{L⁰ Text 2}} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

As one can See It uses the Em-dash der Anderiu ordunge , which helps Us to seperate betwixt Ex./1.1 & Ex./1.2.2’s interpretation models while acknowledging the Illegal use as shown in Ex./1.2.1

1.2.5.1. on Em-dash der Ernﬆiu ordunge.

An Em-dash der Ernﬆiu ordunge is the Main dash that is used in These combination , and ; usage of Em-dash der Ernﬆiu ordunge is as marked :

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 1}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{\text{Text 1} \qquad \text{—} \qquad \text{Text 2}}^{\displaystyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 2}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{\text{|L⁰ Text 1} \qquad \text{—} \qquad \overbrace{ \text{text} \quad \text{Punctuation-mark} \quad\text{text} }^{\textstyle\text{|L⁻¹ Text}} \qquad \text{—} \qquad \text{|L⁰ Text 2}}^{\displaystyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 3}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{\text{|L⁰ Text 1} \qquad \text{—} \qquad \text{|L⁻¹ Text} \qquad \text{—} \qquad \text{|L⁰ Text 2}}^{\displaystyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 4}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 1.1} \quad \text{,} \quad\text{Sub-text 1.2} }^{\textstyle\text{Text 1}} \quad \text{—} \quad \textstyle\text{Text 2} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

1.2.5.2. on Em-dash der Anderiu ordunge.

Examples include :

\[ \overset{ \llap{\textstyle{ Ex./ 1}}\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad }{ \overbrace{ {\textstyle\text{Text 1} } \quad \text{⸺} \quad \overbrace{ \text{Sub-text 2.1}\quad \text{,} \quad\text{Sub-text 2.2} }^{\textstyle\text{Text 2}} }^{\textstyle\text{Sentence part}} } \]

1.2.5.3. on Em-dash der Drittiu ordunge.

1.2.6. Pronouns.

Pronouns are seperated into 2 categories : proper & other , nonetheless ; We will be Only talking about the « Pronouns , proper » , since « Pronouns , other » — such as : « Other », « That » , « This » , & al. — are same & unchanged unless Speciﬁed here.

Pronouns , proper are as follows :

\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text{Pronoun} & \text{Nom.( Sg. )} & \text{Obj.( Sg. )} & \text{Nom.( Pl. )} & \text{Obj.( Pl )} \\ \hline \text{1ˢᵗ person} & I & Me & We & Us \\ \hline \text{2ⁿᵈ person} & You & You† & You & Ye \\ \hline \text{3ʳᵈ-person m.} & He & Him & - & - \\ \hline \text{3ʳᵈ-person f.} & She & Her & - & - \\ \hline \text{3ʳᵈ-person n.} & It & It & - & - \\ \hline \text{3ʳᵈ-person pl.} & - & - & They & Them \\ \hline \text{Indefinite‡} & One & One & Ones & Ones \\ \hline \end{array}\\ \begin{array}{l} \text{† One may also use the Archaic version of} \\ \text{2ⁿᵈ-person Singular-objective pronoun should They wish to.} \\ \text{‡ ‘tis used Inter-changibly with 3ʳᵈ-person Pl.-pronoun.} \end{array} \]

1.2.6.1. on Possessive pronouns.

Possessive pronouns — e.g./ « Mine » , « Thine » , « It’s » , « He’s » , « His » , & al. — are seperated into ; 2 cluﬆers : Cluﬆer α & Cluﬆer β and Cluﬆer α is seperated into 2 classes : Class α & Class β. They are used to mark the ownership.

1.2.6.1.1. of Cluﬆer α.

Class α Possessive pronouns are pronouns with 2 Diﬀerent variations depending on Their Class type.

1.2.6.1.1.1. Class α.

Types for Class α depends on : Their role in the sentence & what comes after Them as a sound. These pronouns are : « My » , « Yer » , & « Your » , and Their forms is as thus :

\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{Before Vowel} & \text{Before Consonant} \\ \hline \text{Before described} & Mine & My \\ \hline \text{After described} & Mine & Mine \\ \hline \end{array} \]

ﬆyle is for 1ˢᵗ-person pronoun All-types possessive ,

\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{Before Vowel} & \text{Before Consonant} \\ \hline \text{Before described} & Your & Yer \\ \hline \text{After described} & Yer & Yer \\ \hline \end{array} \]

is for 2ⁿᵈ-person pronoun Plural posessive , &

\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{Before Vowel} & \text{Before Consonant} \\ \hline \text{Before described} & Thine & Your \\ \hline \text{After described} & Thine & Thine \\ \hline \end{array} \]

is for 2ⁿᵈ-person pronoun Singular possessive.

1.2.6.1.1.2. Class β.

Class β possessives are 3ʳᵈ-person Possesive pronouns formed using Possessive s in the English language , How-ever ; one can also use the Archaic versions currently in use , moreover  They change Their type according to the writer’s Own wish , written hereinunder are Their variations.

\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|} \hline & \text{Form 1} & \text{Form 2} \\ \hline \text{He} & His & He’s \\ \hline\text{She} & Her & She’s \\ \hline \text{It} & Its & It’s \\ \hline \end{array} \]

Writers are encouraged to discover All variations , ergo ; I , personally , use the « It’s » form , moreover  for problems born out of addessing , e.g./ « It is It’s » , while contraction a Pronoun-,-proper-&-verb pair one shall use These forms : « ‘eis He’s » , « ‘heis She’s » , & « ‘tis It’s ».

1.2.6.1.2. of Cluﬆer β.

All-other Possesive pronouns are in This category and follow These rules :

\[ \begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|} \hline \text{} & \text{Before described} & \text{After , Form 1} & \text{After , Form 2}\\ \hline \text{We} & Our & Ours & Our’s \\ \hline \text{They} & Their & Theirs & Their’s \\ \hline \text{One} & One’s & Ones & One’s \\ \hline \text{Ones} & Ones’ & - & Ones’ \\ \hline \text{-self} & -self’s & -selfs & -self’s \\ \hline \end{array} \]

1.2.6.1.2.1. While using -self & Plural version of You.

While using Plural version of You We sꜽ not « Yer-self » but rather use the term « Your-selves ».

1.2.7. Colons.

1.2.7.1. on liﬆing ,

1.2.7.1.1. of 2 elements ,

1.2.7.1.2. of more than 2 elements.

1.2.7.2. on quatation.